(Photo by Romy Arroyo Fernandez/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Notorious “Mushroom Killer” Appeals Conviction After Murdering Three Relatives

The "mushroom killer" was convicted in September 2025 after using deadly death cap mushrooms to murder three of her husband's relatives.

The notorious "mushroom killer" has appealed her convictions of three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder. As reported by the New York Post, three Australian judges will be hearing her appeal over the next couple of days.

In case you weren't aware, 51-year-old Australian Erin Patterson was sentenced to a minimum term of 33 years behind bars. This came after she poisoned four of her estranged husband's relatives with deadly death cap mushrooms.

The mushrooms just look like standard edible mushrooms. However, they are incredibly deadly, containing several toxins that can kill red blood cells and even cause kidney failure.

Patterson was convicted back in September 2025.

Videos by Wide Open Country

The "Mushroom Killer" Says Justice Was Miscarried


Patterson's defense lawyer, Richard Edney, has explained that there were numerous parts of the trial that were performed incorrectly. The "mushroom killer" and her legal team want a retrial. However, the prosecution for the case says they want her sentence to be tightened to life in prison with no possibility of parole.

One of these was the location of the jury members. They were placed in the same hotel as a witness, as well as members of the prosecution team. He explained, "This was a very serious breach of sequestration."

However, the prosecution says that this is not supported by evidence. Bredan Kissane, the prosecutor for the appeal, stated, "There was no actual contact between any juror and any other person."

Another ground for a retrial, according to the defense, is the supposed circumstantial evidence surrounding Patterson's phone connection. In the original case, the "mushroom killer" was said by prosecutors to have seen posts online about there being deadly mushrooms nearby to her town.

However, a defense lawyer, Veronika Drago, says that there was no evidence of this. The evidence used - which said that her phone had connected to phone towers in the areas she supposedly read about - was described as being used in a "dangerous" and "unfair" way.

The trial is ongoing, and we will not know the outcome until every last bit of evidence has been argued and there has been sufficient deliberation. We hope that justice takes its course.